A Question for Congress: Why Didn’t the SEC Stop FTX?

By Hal Scott and John Gulliver. January 18, 2023. (Wall Street Journal).

The Securities and Exchange Commission brought an enforcement action last week against the cryptocurrency brokerages Genesis Global Capital and Gemini Trust. As with the failure of crypto exchange FTX, the SEC is late to the game—likely too late for the 340,000 U.S. customers affected by Genesis’ decision to halt all withdrawals.

Genesis’ financial problems stem from large holdings with FTX, and it is unlikely to be the last crypto firm caught in FTX’s wake. Who is to blame and what can be done to protect U.S. retail investors in crypto?

Rep. Patrick McHenry, the new chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, can answer that question by investigating the SEC’s failure to prevent the FTX disaster. The harm to U.S. investors from the alleged theft of FTX customer assets by Sam Bankman-Fried is likely to be enormous. FTX’s global operations held more than $8 billion in customer assets, and there were 2.7 million U.S. customers of FTX’s U.S. operations alone. FTX customers have had their assets frozen in bankruptcy and now face large losses. They deserve to know why the SEC failed to be the “cop on the beat.”

In 2008, after Bernie Madoff’s Ponzi scheme was revealed, SEC Chairman Christopher Cox promptly initiated an internal investigation into the commission’s failures to uncover the fraud. Gary Gensler, the current chairman, has so far failed to do the same. Madoff’s evasion of applicable SEC regulations was a surprise. FTX’s state of nonregulation was the reddest of flags. Madoff was largely cheating rich sophisticated investors. FTX’s retail investors were left helpless.

Read the full article here.

S.E.C. Charges Crypto Companies With Offering Unregistered Securities

By Ephrat Livni. January 12, 2023. (New York Times).

The Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday charged the cryptocurrency lender Genesis Global Capital and the cryptocurrency exchange Gemini Trust with offering unregistered securities through a program that promised investors high interest on deposits.

The S.E.C. said that Genesis, a subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, and Gemini, which is run by Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, had raised billions of dollars of assets from hundreds of thousands of investors without registering the program, which was called Gemini Earn.

By doing so, Genesis and Gemini bypassed “disclosure requirements designed to protect investors,” Gary Gensler, the S.E.C. chair, said in a statement. He added that the charges should “make clear to the marketplace and the investing public that crypto lending platforms and other intermediaries need to comply with our time-tested securities laws.”

Read the full article here.

SEC Spin Doctors Trying To Hide Crypto Regulation Disaster

By Roslyn Layton. January 8, 2022. (Forbes).

Over the last two U.S. administrations, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has promoted an all-encompassing policy of “regulation by enforcement” for U.S.-based digital asset markets like Coinbase and the enterprise blockchain industry that develops fintech solutions like Ethereum, Ripple, Stellar and Circle. Two successive chairmen – Jay Clayton and Gary Gensler – said that every digital asset except bitcoin is a security and should register at the SEC like a stock. The details end there, unless you end up on the wrong side of an SEC lawsuit. The SEC banks on a quick settlement from the parties it charges. Parties which dare to challenge the SEC need financial reserves, superstar lawyers, and years of patience for litigation to play out court. This “enforcement” produces little clarity for the market or protection of investors, which is the ostensible point of the regulatory exercise.

Read the full article here.

SEC Shouldn’t Win ‘Most Overbroad’ Ripple Suit, Court Told

By Emilie Ruscoe. November 16, 2022. (Law360)

A group of investors in Ripple Labs Inc.’s signature digital assets XRP have argued the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s allegations in its suit against the blockchain company “are quite possibly the most overbroad, far-reaching claims ever made in an SEC enforcement action,” asking a New York federal judge to deny the regulator a win in its suit.

In a Wednesday amicus brief, the group of six individual XRP holders told U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres she should deny the SEC’s September motion for summary judgment, telling her the SEC seeks to have jurisdiction over “an entire digital asset ecosystem” by asking for her to rule in its favor on its claim the sale of XRP constitutes offering unregistered securities.

Read the full article here.

Crypto Law Experts Suggest SEC Likely To Lose Key Case And Discredit Howey Test

As the cryptocurrency trial of the century draws to an close in a Manhattan federal court, there are increasing signs that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) faces a bruising defeat against the San Francisco-based enterprise blockchain innovator Ripple Labs. The verdict could drastically limit the SEC’s authority to regulate crypto in the United States. If that’s how it ends, it will have been a self-inflicted disaster from the start.

The SEC filed its bombshell lawsuit against Ripple and its two senior executives in December 2020, on the last day in office for ex-chairman Jay Clayton. The Republican voted with the two Democratic commissioners to allege that the cryptocurrency XRP is an unregistered security because its only utility since 2013 has been to be an investment contract in a company that uses it for its payment software.

Read the full article here.

SEC Treating Ripple Like a Ponzi Schemer, Not Shaper of Future

By JW Verret. October 27, 2022. (Real Clear Markets).

The Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) case against Ripple, the largest case it has brought against a defendant working in the crypto industry to date, has been heating up this month with a series of summary motions and some big discovery losses for the SEC. The SEC alleges in that case that one test for a security required to register with the SEC, contained in the 1946 Supreme Court case SEC v Howey, applies to the XRP token that is used by Ripple.

The SEC should admit the secret it isn’t saying out loud to the court and everyone watching the case. The test used in SEC v. Howey is typically used by the SEC to sue hucksters, Ponzi schemers and other con men who sell fake securities. The Howey test is a way to stop them, not a means to facilitate registration with the SEC.

Read the full article here.

Gary Gensler’s Bad Performance Review

By WSJ Editorial Board. October 26, 2022. (Wall Street Journal)

Businesses have been warning that Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Gary Gensler’s fast-and-furious regulation could cause damage across the economy. Now agency officials and Democratic Senators are raising alarms too.

The SEC Office of Inspector General this month issued a withering review of Mr. Gensler’s leadership that would probably get a CEO of a public company sacked. Agency division managers told the IG that his move-fast-and-break-things agenda is overwhelming staff and taking resources from investor protection.

The number of rule-makings on the SEC agenda increased by nearly two-thirds between spring 2017 and 2022. In the first eight months of 2022, the SEC proposed 26 new rules, twice as many as in 2020 and 2021. Unlike predecessor Jay Clayton’s rules that focused on investor protection, Mr. Gensler is sprinting to impose new burdens on business in line with the progressive desire to achieve via regulation that Democrats can’t get through Congress. Investor protection is an afterthought.

Read the full article here.

For Clarity on Cryptocurrency, Look to Congress or the Supreme Court

By Curt Levey. August 1, 2022. (The Federalist Society)

With the rapid growth of cryptocurrencies have come increasing calls for its regulation and both uncertainty and overreach concerning the applicability of existing rules. If Congress doesn’t address the regulatory confusion, that job may fall to the Supreme Court.

Most of the attention has focused on the Securities and Exchange Commission, which has sued a number of companies in the cryptocurrency field, citing its authority to regulate securities under the 1933 Securities Act and the 1934 Securities Exchange Act. But that’s quite a stretch. Unsurprisingly, those 90-year-old statutes did not include anything like crypto—that is, digital assets existing only on a decentralized ledger (the “blockchain”) that’s distributed across disparate computers—in their definition of a security.

Instead, the Acts defined a “security” by listing well-understood examples, such as “stock” and “bond,” then adding a catch-all term, “investment contract.” Because cryptocurrency is not among the examples, the SEC argues that crypto is sometimes an investment contract.

Read the full article here.

Ripple slams SEC bid to shield experts in high-profile crypto case

By Jody Godoy. July 11, 2022. (Reuters)

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has made an “unprecedented” move to keep the names of its expert witnesses under wraps, Ripple Labs Inc said in a filing in the agency’s highly-watched case over the cryptocurrency XRP.

The San Francisco-based company told U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres on Sunday that the SEC had insisted Ripple’s challenges to three SEC experts be filed under seal, until the judge decides whether to shield the opinion of a fourth expert whom the SEC says has faced “threats and harassment.”

The experts play a key role in the SEC’s lawsuit alleging Ripple and its current and former chief executives have been conducting a $1.3 billion unregistered securities offering by selling XRP, which Ripple’s founders created in 2012.

Attorneys in the cryptocurrency sphere are following the case closely as it could have legal ramifications for other digital assets.

Ripple and the executives have denied the allegations, and the company has argued that XRP has traded and been used as a digital currency.

Read the full article here.

Ripple vs SEC: Legal Expert Warns Adverse Ruling in Lawsuit Would Be Catastrophic for Crypto Industry.

By Daily Hodl Staff. July 9, 2022. (The Daily Hodl)

A legal expert warns an unfavorable ruling in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) lawsuit against Ripple would be bad for crypto.

Deaton Law Firm managing partner John E. Deaton says the outcome of the SEC lawsuit alleging that XRP is a security will determine whether nearly all other existing altcoins are securities.

Read the full article here.

Since Chairman Patrick McHenry threatened to SUBPOENA Gary Gensler for NON-COMPLIANCE with Congressional oversight.

ACT NOW!